Legal Opinion

Grady v. . Faison

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 1, 1944PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

The plaintiff grounded his action for compensation for services to the defendant’s intestate upon an alleged special contract or agreement to compensate him therefor by devising to him all the property, real and personal, she might own at her death. However, the referee who heard all the evidence found as a fact that the decedent and plaintiff did not enter into the special contract alleged. This finding, which is supported by evidence, was approved and confirmed by the trial judge, and hence the conclusion on this point must be regarded as unassailable. Dent v. Mica Co., 212 N. C., 241, 193…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Grantham v. . GranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Miller v. . LashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. Winkler v. Killian.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Brown v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Price v. . AskinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Coley v. . DalrympleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Johnson v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Ritchie v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Jamerson v. . LoganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API