Legal Opinion

Jamerson v. . Logan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 3, 1948PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

We think the plaintiff has misconceived her rights and remedies.

Conceding, without deciding, that the complaint contains sufficient allegation of a special promise on the part, of C. L. Freeman to devise and bequeath all of his real and personal property to the plaintiff in consideration of services to be rendered by her — the theory upon which the case was tried — we think the action, as thus encompassed and tried, must fail because the promise falls within the statute of frauds and is not in writing. Cf. S., 22-2; Stewart v. Wyrick, ante, 429; Coley v. Dalrymple, 225 N. C., 67, 33 S. E.…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Stokes v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Bonham v. . CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. Grantham v. . GranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Ontario Bank v. RootNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  5. Hall v. Misenheimer.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. CCT Equipment Co. v. Hertz CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Yaggy v. BVD COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. McCraw v. LlewellynSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Pickelsimer Ex Rel. Gash v. PickelsimerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Humphrey v. FaisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API