Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 16, 1950No. 14013PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board, upon findings that the respondent had engaged in unfair labor practices in violation of Section 8(a) (1) and 8(a) (3) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., as amended by the Labor Management Relations Act, 1947, 61 Stat. 136, 29 U.S.C.A. § 141 et seq., on February 10, 1949, ordered the respondent to cease and desist from such practices, to reinstate and reimburse for loss of pay Robert Eall and Fred Boyd, two of its employees whom the Board found had been discriminatorily laid off, and to post…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- H. J. Heinz Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Donnelly Garment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pittsburgh Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Allegheny Ludlum Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc, Intervenor ForCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Pittsburgh S. S. Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
- Bituminous Material & Supply Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wheeling Pipe Line, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.