Legal Opinion
Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Costello
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 23, 1894No. 998PublishedCited by 14 opinions
From the White Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, C. J.
The complaint in this case is as follows:
“The plaintiff complains of the defendant, and says that defendant is and was, at the time hereinafter mentioned, a corporation, duly organized under the laws of the State of Indiana, and owned and operated, as a common carrier for hire, a line of railroad known as the Louisville, New Albany and Chicago Railway, passing-through and from the town of Rensselaer, in the county of Jasper, in the State of Indiana, to and through the town of Reynolds, in the county of White, in said State, with the track, cars, locomotives and other appurtenances thereto…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GramesIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Woolery v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Noblesville Gas & Improvement Co. v. LoehrIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Rush v. Coal Bluff Mining Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. FinnellIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cleveland, Etc., Railway Co. v. MoneyhunIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Dull v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Walkup v. MayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Austin v. McMainsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
- Evansville Street Railway Co. v. MeadowsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.