Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. Finnell
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Marion Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.
It is charged in appellees’ complaint that, in consideration of a grant by them to the railway company of a strip of land upon which to construct and operate its road, that corporation agreed to pay to appellee's $500, fence the way so granted on both sides through their land, and build two farm crossings for their convenience. It is further charged that the railway company has failed and refused to build and construct the fences and farm crossings.
The purpose of this action is to recover the damages which, it is averred, resulted from the breach of the contract on the part of the railway…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stockwell v. State ex rel. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. SumnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by11 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Board of Commissioners v. PearsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Graves v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Citizens Bank v. BolenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BerkeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.