Legal Opinion

Walkup v. May

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 1894No. 1,102PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Prom the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGavin, J.

Appellee sued the appellants for damages resulting from the negligent failure of appellants’ servant to turn his team to the right when he met appellee driving upon a public highway.

There was a trial by jury, and a special verdict on which judgment was rendered in appellee’s favor.

The. correctness of the court’s action upon the special verdict is the only question we are called upon to consider.

In order to justify a recovery by the party upon whom rests the burden of proof, the special finding or verdict must contain all the facts essential to such recovery.

The verdict must find the facts and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GramesIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Conner v. Citizens Street Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railway Co. v. BurgerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. BrunkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. DuganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Morrison v. LeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Shirk v. Wabash RailroadIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Alexandria Mining & Exploring Co. v. IrishIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Wabash Railroad v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API