Legal Opinion
State v. O'Connor
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 2016No. 20150299PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] The State appeals from an order suppressing the result of an Intoxilyzer chemical test in its prosecution of Blaise O’Connor for driving under the influence of alcohol. We affirm the suppression order because the law enforcement officer after placing O’Connor under arrest did not inform him of the complete implied consent advisory before administering the Intoxilyzer test.
I
[¶ 2] On May 24, 2015, a highway patrol officer stopped O’Connor’s vehicle for a defective taillight. The officer observed O’Connor 'had slurred speech and bloodshot and watery eyes. O’Connor…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. GrafNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BirchfieldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. AbrahamsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. RufusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Schoon v. N.D. Dep't of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. BoheNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. VigenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- DeForest v. N.D. Dep't of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- City of Bismarck v. VagtsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.