Legal Opinion

Nass v. Mossner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1961No. Docket 2, 3, Calendar 48,232, 48,233PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, C. J.

In these two cases, combined for trial and appeal purposes, plaintiffs appeal from a directed verdict for defendants. Plaintiff Eobert A. Nass, hereinafter called the plaintiff, was the driver and his father, plaintiff Henry W. Nass, was the owner of an automobile insured by plaintiff insurance company. Suits were for plaintiff’s personal injuries and for damages to the father’s automobile. Defendants were owners of a tractor and attached farm wagon drawn by it.

Viewing the evidence, as we must (Firemen’s Insurance Co. v. Sterling Coal Co., 348 Mich 564), in the light most favorable to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Ruth v. VroomMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Spencer v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Lett v. Summerfield & HechtMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Martin v. J. A. Mercier Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Zeni v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Hodge v. BordenIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Patzer v. Bowerman-Halifax Funeral HomeMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Tacie v. White Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Lucas v. CarsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API