Legal Opinion

Ruth v. Vroom

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1928No. Docket No. 136, Calendar No. 33,672PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, C. J.

Between 2 and 3 o’clock a. m., October 13, 1924, a Maxwell touring car, driven by Fay White, and in which' plaintiff was riding, crashed into a trailer attached to a Federal truck owned by defendants Vroom, and plaintiff was severely injured. She had verdict against both defendants in action for damages. Judgment for defendants notwithstanding verdict was entered by the court on reserved motion, on the ground of White’s contributory negligence, imputable to plaintiff. Plaintiff has brought error and the testimony most favorable to her must be accepted.

White, plaintiff, two other men, two…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spencer v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Lett v. Summerfield & HechtMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Holsaple v. Menominee Sup'ts of PoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Gleason v. LoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Diederichs v. DukeMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Smiley v. Arrow Spring Bed Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. HussIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Pittman v. SatherIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Wosoba v. KenyonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GillespieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API