Patzer v. Bowerman-Halifax Funeral Home
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.
These consolidated suits for negligence bring to consideration anew the assured-cleardistanee rule of motoring conduct. The rule is a creature of statute (PA 1927, No 318, title 3, § 5; CLS 1956, § 257.627, as amended by PA 1957, No 190 [Stat Ann 1957 Cum Supp § 9.2327]). The antecedents thereof lie with the common law (see cases cited in Lett v. Summerfield & Hecht, 239 Mich 699 at 702). Its application to variant evidentiary circumstances, once visibly to the rigid, 1 has by force of inexorably developing traffic conditions been modified in recent years to one of “reasonable construction.”…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Normand v. Thomas Theatre Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Lett v. Summerfield & HechtMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Sun Oil Company v. SeamonMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Flynn v. KramerMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Warwick v. BlackneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Zeni v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Moore v. SpanglerMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- McKinney v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
- Vander Laan v. MiedemaMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Tsugawa v. ReinartzHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.