Legal Opinion

Patzer v. Bowerman-Halifax Funeral Home

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1963No. Calendar 17, 18, Docket 49,244, 49,245PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

These consolidated suits for negligence bring to consideration anew the assured-cleardistanee rule of motoring conduct. The rule is a creature of statute (PA 1927, No 318, title 3, § 5; CLS 1956, § 257.627, as amended by PA 1957, No 190 [Stat Ann 1957 Cum Supp § 9.2327]). The antecedents thereof lie with the common law (see cases cited in Lett v. Summerfield & Hecht, 239 Mich 699 at 702). Its application to variant evidentiary circumstances, once visibly to the rigid, 1 has by force of inexorably developing traffic conditions been modified in recent years to one of “reasonable construction.”…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Normand v. Thomas Theatre Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Lett v. Summerfield & HechtMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Sun Oil Company v. SeamonMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Flynn v. KramerMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Warwick v. BlackneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1935

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Zeni v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Moore v. SpanglerMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  3. McKinney v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Vander Laan v. MiedemaMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Tsugawa v. ReinartzHawaii Supreme Court · 1974

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API