Legal Opinion

Lett v. Summerfield & Hecht

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1927No. Docket No. 53PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

A furniture van owned by Summer-field & Hecht and operated by the individual defend ants, its employees, was being used to make a delivery of furniture out John R. street and over in Oakland county. It had nearly reached the Ten-mile road when the employees, not being certain just where the point of delivery was located, stopped, and one of them went into a store for information. The van was left standing partly on and partly off the cement pavement, which was 18 or 20 feet wide. • The van had no tail light. It was about 6 o’clock of a December evening, quite dark and foggy, and some rain was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Spencer v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Holsaple v. Menominee Sup'ts of PoorMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Gleason v. LoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Budnick v. PetersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Zeni v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Ruth v. VroomMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Smiley v. Arrow Spring Bed Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. HussIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API