Legal Opinion

Zeni v. Anderson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1976No. 56479, (Calendar No. 8)PublishedCited by 111 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

Two issues confront us in this negligence case. The first is the effect of an alleged violation of statute by plaintiff. The second is the sufficiency of Michigan Standard Jury Instruction 14.01 on last clear chance. We hold that violation of a statute by plaintiff or defendant creates a prima facie case from which a jury may draw an inference of negligence. The jury may also consider whether a legally sufficient excuse has been presented to refute this inference. As for the second question, we find that the approach of the American Law Institute in the second Restatement of Torts gives a…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Satterlee v. Orange Glenn School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Clinkscales v. CarverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Phoenix Refining Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Rudes v. GottschalkTexas Supreme Court · 1959

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by111 opinions

  1. Jennings v. SouthwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Kirby v. LarsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Orzel v. Scott Drug Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Hardy v. Monsanto Enviro-Chem Systems, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Longstreth v. GenselMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API