Legal Opinion

Taber v. Pettus Oil & Refining Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1942No. 2420-7909PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREWSTER, Commissioner.

This is a suit by respondent, Pettus Oil & Refining Company, against petitioner, Eugene Taber, for the sum of $1,350 balance due under an alleged written contract executed by Taber with Raneo Oil Corporation, respondent’s assignor. The instrument is as follows:

“December 11th, 1937.
“Raneo Oil Corporation,
“1201 Gulf States Building,
“Dallas, Texas.
“Gentlemen:
“This will confirm our verbal agreement under the terms of which I agree to buy and you agree to sell me, One Hundred and Sixty (160) acres of Oil and Gas leases, covering the following described tracts, situated in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hooks v. BridgewaterTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Smith Et Ux. v. SorelleTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Robertson v. MeltonTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Cantrell v. GarrardTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  5. Fagg v. Texas Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Cohen v. McCutchinTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Cowden v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Gruss v. CumminsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Lohse v. Atlantic Richfield Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Crowder v. Tri-C Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API