Cowden v. Bell
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garwood
The issue in this title suit, brought by our respondent, W. H. Bell, for a one-twelfth undivided mineral interest in a tract in Frio County, is the effect of a parol reconveyance of that interest allegedly made by him to one of our petitioners (defendants) George Cowden, a few weeks after an admittedly valid original conveyance of the same interest by deed from Cowden to Bell. The Court of Civil Appeals has affirmed a summary judgment in favor of the respondent-plaintiff Bell and against the petitioner-defendant (George Cowden and his donee-grantees) on the ground that, taking as true what…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hooks v. BridgewaterTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Chevalier v. Lane's, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
- The Texas Co. v. BurkettTexas Supreme Court · 1927
- Robertson v. MeltonTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Morris v. GainesTexas Supreme Court · 1891
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
- Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Wilcox v. St. Mary's University of San Antonio, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1975
- Boyert v. TauberTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Villarreal v. Laredo National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.