Legal Opinion

Cowden v. Bell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1957No. A-6039PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Garwood

The issue in this title suit, brought by our respondent, W. H. Bell, for a one-twelfth undivided mineral interest in a tract in Frio County, is the effect of a parol reconveyance of that interest allegedly made by him to one of our petitioners (defendants) George Cowden, a few weeks after an admittedly valid original conveyance of the same interest by deed from Cowden to Bell. The Court of Civil Appeals has affirmed a summary judgment in favor of the respondent-plaintiff Bell and against the petitioner-defendant (George Cowden and his donee-grantees) on the ground that, taking as true what…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hooks v. BridgewaterTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Chevalier v. Lane's, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  3. The Texas Co. v. BurkettTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Robertson v. MeltonTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Morris v. GainesTexas Supreme Court · 1891

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Wilcox v. St. Mary's University of San Antonio, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Boyert v. TauberTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Villarreal v. Laredo National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API