Legal Opinion

Fagg v. Texas Co.

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 15, 1933No. 1612-6018PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARVEY, Presiding Judge.

In this suit, the plaintiff in error, G. 'E. Fagg, seeks to enforce specific performance of a contract in writing entered into by and between the plaintiff in error, on the one hand, and the defendants in error J. A. Bracken and wife, on the other. In the plaintiff’s petition it is alleged that, by virtue of the terms of the contract, Bracken and wife became bound to execute to Fagg, the plaintiff, an oil •and gas lease investing the plaintiff with the right to bore wells for oil and gas on a certain tract of four and a fraction acres of land described in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cantrell v. GarrardTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  2. Anders v. JohnsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Fagg v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Smith Et Ux. v. SorelleTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Lohse v. Atlantic Richfield Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Oakrock Exploration Co. v. Killam, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
  4. Taber v. Pettus Oil & Refining Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1942
  5. Taber v. Pettus Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API