Legal Opinion
Lohse v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 9, 1986No. Civ. 11099PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
The plaintiffs, members of the Lohse family, appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their action against Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) for enforcement of an alleged oral agreement to lease approximately 4,000 mineral acres owned by the Lohses. We affirm.
The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the Lohse family [e.g., Gowin v. Hazen Memorial Hosp. Ass’n, 349 N.W.2d 4, 8 (N.D.1984) ], indicates that during 1982, ARCO commenced an oil and gas leasing program in Williams and Divide counties. ARCO sent several landmen to the area, and each was assigned a…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Hoffman v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Kiely v. St. GermainSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Janke Construction Company, Inc. v. Vulcan Materials CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Morey v. HoffmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- Laks v. Coast Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Jamestowne on Signal, Inc. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
- State Bank of Standish v. CurryMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Union State Bank v. WoellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Triton Corporation v. Hardrives, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Matter of Estate of HillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.