Legal Opinion

Smith Et Ux. v. Sorelle

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1935No. 6389PublishedCited by 135 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sharp

W. F. Smith and wife instituted this suit in the District Court of Upshur County against R. H. Busby, R. W. Fails, and F. L. Sorelle, for the purpose of cancelling certain mineral deeds: one executed by Smith and wife to R. H. Busby, and two executed by R. H. Busby, — one to R. F. Fails and one to F. L. Sorelle. The cause was tried before the court without a jury, and judgment was entered cancelling the three deeds involved. Busby, Fails, and Sorelle appealed the case to the Court of Civil Appeals at Texarkana, and the judgment as to Busby was affirmed; but the judgment of the trial court was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Norris v. HuntTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Smith v. CrosbyTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Coker v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Chinoweth v. Lessee of HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  5. Tram Lumber Co. v. HancockTexas Supreme Court · 1888

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by135 opinions

  1. Morrow v. ShotwellTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Pickett v. BishopTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. First National Bank in Dallas v. KinabrewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Gates v. AsherTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Long Trusts v. GriffinTexas Supreme Court · 2006

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API