Legal Opinion
Union Bank v. Ross
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 9, 1976No. Civ. 44919PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KINGSLEY, Acting P. J.
This is an action on four continuing guaranties in favor of plaintiff Union Bank. Two of the guaranties were executed by defendants A1 Ross and Sheila Ross, and the remaining two guaranties were executed by defendants Irving Holender and Miriam Holender. The obligation giving rise to the claims were represented by a promissory note executed by Carnaby Street Fish & Chips, Inc. for $100,000. Judgment was entered against all defendants for $124,577.89 with taxable costs.
The Rosses counterclaimed against Union Bank for attorney fees, wrongful withholding of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kruger v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- City of Ukiah v. FonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Kinnison v. Guaranty Liquidating Corp.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Wiener v. Van WinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Marin Storage & Trucking, Inc. v. Benco Contracting & Engineering, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- River Bank America v. DillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Rutan v. Summit Sports, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- United States v. H & S Realty Co., Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- United States of America on Behalf and for the Benefit of Army Athletic Association and Naval Academy Athletic Association v. Reliance Insurance Company, Reliance Insurance Company, Third-Party-Plaintiff v. Army-Navy '83 Foundation, a California Non-Profit Corporation Robert H. Finch, an Individual and Rolfe G. Arnhym, an Individual, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.