Legal Opinion

City of Ukiah v. Fones

California Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1966No. S.F. 21721PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.

The principal question presented on this appeal is whether a stipulation entered into by a discharged civil service employee, stating that if his discharge was wrongful he was entitled to back salary for the period prior to the filing of the complaint, may be deemed a waiver by him of all wages to which he would have been entitled for the period subsequent to that date and until reinstatement or retirement. As will appear, we have concluded that no such waiver may be implied and hence that the judgment must be reversed.

On June 9, 1959, at the age of 66, George Fones was summarily dismissed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Mass v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Roesch v. De MotaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Stockton v. Department of EmploymentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Warburton v. KieferleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Henderson v. DrakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. WareSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Ringler Associates Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Bickel v. City of PiedmontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Unzueta v. Ocean View School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API