Legal Opinion

United States v. H & S Realty Co., Etc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 24, 1987No. 87-1061PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFIN, Circuit Judge.

In this meticulously briefed appeal, the parties have presented a vast array of authorities favoring and disfavoring the capacity of a guarantor to waive the commercial reasonableness requirement of section 9-504(3) of the Uniform Commercial Code, Me.Rev.Stat.Ann. tit. 11, § 9-504(3). The question of a guarantor’s ability to waive is one not specifically addressed by the drafters of the U.C.C. and has predictably generated a diversity of respectable views. The district court has addressed the issues in a thoughtful and extensive opinion, 647 F.Supp. 1415. We affirm…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Atlas Thrift Co. v. HoranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. United States Ex Rel. Small Business Administration v. MorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. LototskyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Camden National Bank v. St. ClairSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
  5. Wiener v. Van WinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity as Liquidator of First State Bank Pflugerville v. Jerry S. PayneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  2. Great Southwest Life Insurance Co. v. FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Gambo v. Bank of MarylandCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. May v. Women's Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API