Legal Opinion

Equi v. City & County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 8, 1936No. Civ. 9781PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiff individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, brought this action for declaratory and injunctive relief. Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff and defendants have appealed.

The complaint in this action shows that respondent sought to attack the validity of the provisions of Ordinance 5132 (New Series) of the City and County of San Francisco in so far as said ordinance imposed certain taxes upon automobile supply stations, commonly known as service stations. A read ing of the judgment shows that the trial court declared that the license tax of $40 per quarter…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Alaska Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Carter v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Portland v. Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State Board of Equalization v. People ex rel. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  5. Stockwell v. McAlvayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. MHC Operating Limited Partnership v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  2. Van't Rood v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Sierra Club v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Callie v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Jordan v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API