Legal Opinion
O'NEAL v. Seabury
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 8, 1938No. Civ. 5913PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment which was rendered against them, dismissing their action following an order sustaining a demurrer to their complaint without leave to amend the pleading. The complaint alleges that certain officers of the county of Madera threaten to enforce against the defendants the provisions of an ordinance of that county, number 164, adopted to create a “Tuberculosis Control Area” for the purpose of inspecting, segregating and testing cattle for the purpose of eradicating tuberculosis therefrom; that the ordinance is in conflict with the provisions of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Robinson v. . Robins Dry Dock Repair Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Carter v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Hild v. Justice's Court of Stockton TownshipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
3Cited by9 opinions
- Paul v. Milk Depots, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Sierra Club v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Loftis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Jordan v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Lee v. GatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.