Legal Opinion
City of Los Angeles v. Wolfe
California Supreme Court
Decided December 16, 1971No. Docket Nos. L.A. 29896, 29897PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McCOMB, J.
The city commenced this action in 1968 to condemn the fee in five adjacent parcels of real property in the Westwood area of Los Angeles for public off-street parking. Parcel 3 thereof is owned by defendants. They also own another piece of real property (herein 3-A) which the city did not seek to condemn and which is not physically contiguous to parcel 3. However, defendants claimed a right to severance damages to parcel 3-A, pursuant to section 1248 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1 by reason of the taking of parcel 3 under the special circumstances of this case.
The pretrial…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- City of Oakland v. Pacific Coast Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- East Bay Municipal Utility District v. KiefferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Querubin v. ThronasHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
- American Savings and Loan Association, a California Corporation v. County of Marin, a Public EntityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Housing Authority of Newark v. Norfolk Realty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- South Bay Irrigation District v. California-American Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Summit Media, LLC v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.