Legal Opinion

California Pacific Title & Trust Co. v. California Mining & Dredging Syndicate

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 5, 1936No. Civ. No. 10108PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiff sued the defendant to recover on several promissory notes. That action was brought and tried in the Superior Court in San Francisco.

As the latter was a foreign corporation, service was made by attaching certain lands in Humboldt County and pub*354lishing the summons. The defendant did not appear and on August 31, 1934, judgment by default was entered in favor of the plaintiff. Later execution issued and the property so attached as aforesaid was sold.

About ten months after the judgment was entered certain stockholders commenced an action in partition. That' action was brought in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Hamilton Trust Co. v. Cornucopia Mines Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915
  3. State ex rel. Ashton v. ImelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  4. Richards v. California Mining & Dredging SyndicateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Consolidated Vultee Aircraft Corp. v. United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America Local 904California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Environmental Coalition of Orange County, Inc. v. Local Agency Formation CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Hamilton v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Jordan v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Estate of TierneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API