Legal Opinion
Hall v. Peacock Fixture & Electric Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 29, 1984No. 11511PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrillo, J.
The plaintiff Richard W. Hall brought the present action to discharge the defendant Peacock Fixture and Electric Company, Inc., mechanic’s lien on property owned by the plaintiff and leased to a third party. On appeal from the judgment discharging the mechanic’s lien, the defendant claims that the plaintiffs actions constituted “consent” by the owner within the meaning of General Statutes § 49-33 (a).1 We disagree.
*292The following uncontroverted facts form the basis of this appeal: On July 10, 1980, the plaintiff entered into a long-term lease with Mrs. Margaret Ferretti involving a building…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Beckenstein v. Potter & Carrier, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Botticello v. StefanoviczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Seaman v. Climate Control Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Lyon v. ChampionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
- Battistelli v. JacobsonConnecticut Superior Court · 1944
3Cited by24 opinions
- Newtown Associates v. Northeast Structures, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Connecticut Carpenters Benefit Funds v. Burkhard Hotel Partners II, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Centerbrook, Architects & Planners v. Laurel Nursing Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- St. Catherine's Church Corp. v. Technical Planning Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.