Legal Opinion
Beckenstein v. Potter & Carrier, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 16, 1983No. 10958PublishedCited by 92 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The plaintiffs in this case, Louis Beckenstein and Henry Beckenstein (plaintiffs), are the owners and developers of the Wintonbury Mall in Bloomfield. There were originally two defendants in the case: Potter & Carrier, Inc. (Potter & Carrier) was a roofing contractor hired by the plaintiffs in 1969 to install a roof on certain buildings in the mall; General Aniline & Film Corporation (GAF) was the manufacturer of certain roofing material utilized by Potter & Carrier in installing the roof. After Potter & Carrier had completed its work, the roof developed leaks and, by 1975, it had to be…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- General Building Contractors Assn., Inc. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Narragansett Wire Co. v. NorbergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- Conte v. Dwan Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Lar-Rob Bus Corp. v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Alvarez v. Felker Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Gordon v. Bridgeport Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Johnson v. Priceline.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Gateway Co. v. DiNoiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Chmielewski v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.