Jones v. Jones
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This was an action to have declared void two deeds for a tract of land, one executed by the plaintiff to the defendant Jones, and another executed by the defendant Jones to the defendant Simpson, and for a decree that the plaintiff is the owner in fee of the property, and that neither Jones nor Simpson has any interest therein. The appeal is from the judgment-roll, and from an order denying the defendants’ motion for a judgment in their,favor on the findings. The following facts alleged in the complaint are found to be true, to wit: That the plaintiff and the defendant Jones were at all the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Feeney v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Kittle v. BellegardeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Alaniz v. CasenaveCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Hayne v. HermannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by21 opinions
- Cooney v. GlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Lauricella v. LauricellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Bradley Co. v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Steinberger v. SteinbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Rosemead Co. v. Shipley Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.