Legal Opinion

Department of Labor & Industry, Bureau of Employment Security v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 17, 1964No. Appeal, No. 13PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

This is an appeal by the Bureau of Employment Security from the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review holding amended Regulation 117, promulgated by the Bureau, effective January 1, 1962, to be arbitrary, unreasonable and invalid insofar as it purports to restrict the allocation of unused taxable wages to subsequent quarters “in sequence and in the amount in which (such) remuneration is received.”

Oscar Lee Harman was involuntarily retired by his employer, Baldwin Lima Hamilton Corporation on October 31, 1961. His actual earnings during 1960 and 1961…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Yellow Cab Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. American Steel & Wire Co. of New Jersey v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. McGinness Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Gonta Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gladieux Food Services, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. JolliffeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. All Steel, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Gladieux Food Services, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Stanley Manufacturing Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API