Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stanley Manufacturing Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1966No. Appeal, No. 303Published

1Dissent

*295Dissenting Opinion by

Watkins, J.:

I respectfully dissent. The opinion of the majority is a strict interpretation of an amendment to this remedial statute and goes far beyond the legislative intent.

On April 14, 1965, the Bureau of Employment Security issued a bulletin No. 505, Supp. No. 12 Rev. entitled “1964 Amendments To The Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Law Benefit Provisions”. “Post Pregnancy Work Test”. In this bulletin the Bureau says, inter alia: “The Law is intended to prevent payment of benefits to claimants who have withdrawn from the labor force to raise a family. It does,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jones v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Department of Labor & Industry, Bureau of Employment Security v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API