Legal Opinion

Yellow Cab Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1952No. Appeals, Nos. 236 and 238PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

We are all of the opinion that the reasoning* upon which the Board of "Review awarded unemployment compensation in these cases, is specious. To affirm the orders would be the equivalent of saying that claimants who without authority induce an illegal stoppage of work amounting to a “wildcat strike”, following a groundless labor dispute fomented by them, nevertheless are not barred from unemployment compensation, after their discharge by their employer because of their willful misconduct in these respects. Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law as last amended…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Cartwright v. CartwrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Detterer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Penflex, Inc. v. BrysonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Cassar v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Weimer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Flores v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Howard Bros. Manufacturing Co. v. Director of Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API