Yellow Cab Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
We are all of the opinion that the reasoning* upon which the Board of "Review awarded unemployment compensation in these cases, is specious. To affirm the orders would be the equivalent of saying that claimants who without authority induce an illegal stoppage of work amounting to a “wildcat strike”, following a groundless labor dispute fomented by them, nevertheless are not barred from unemployment compensation, after their discharge by their employer because of their willful misconduct in these respects. Section 402(e) of the Unemployment Compensation Law as last amended…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Cartwright v. CartwrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Detterer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
3Cited by22 opinions
- Penflex, Inc. v. BrysonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Cassar v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
- Weimer Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Flores v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Howard Bros. Manufacturing Co. v. Director of Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1955
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.