Parker v. Stryker Corp.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
BLACKBURN, District Judge.
The matters before me are (1) Defendant Howmedica Osteonics Corporation’s Motion To Dismiss [# 7], filed August 14, 2008; and (2) Defendants Howmedica Osteonics Corp.’s and Stryker Corporation’s Rule 72 Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Order Denying Motion To Stay Discovery [# 33], filed October 16, 2008. I grant the motion the mo tion to dismiss and overrule the objections as moot.
I.JURISDICTION
I have subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (diversity of citizenship).
II.STANDARD OF REVIEW
When ruling on a…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ridge at Red Hawk, L.L.C. v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- In Re Medtronic, Inc., Sprint Fidelis LeadsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Alton Bass v. Stryker CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Wolicki-Gables v. Arrow International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- In Re Medtronic, Inc. Sprint Fidelis Leads Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Horowitz v. Stryker Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.