Legal Opinion
Wolicki-Gables v. Arrow International, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided March 8, 2011No. 09-14342PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge:
Robert Gables and Linda Wolicki-Gables appeal from the District Court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Arrow International (“Arrow”), Codman & Shurtleff (“Codman”), Johnson & Johnson, and Greg Nelson (collectively “Appellees”). The Gableses contend that the state law claims they brought against Appellees are not preempted by the Medical Device Amendments of 1976 (“MDA”). The Gableses also assert that the District Court erred in determining that she was not entitled to a presumption that the catheter connector for the Arrow pump implanted in Linda Wolicki-Gables…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Bates v. Dow Agrosciences LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Delores M. Brooks v. County Commission, JeffersonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Cassisi v. Maytag Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Alton Bass v. Stryker CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Joseph Mink v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Caplinger v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Ramirez v. Medtronic Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2013
- Houston v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, D. California · 2013
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.