Legal Opinion
Horowitz v. Stryker Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 20, 2009No. Civil Action CV-07-1572(DGT)PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
TRAGER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Lindsay Horowitz (“plaintiff’ or “Horowitz”), brings this action against Stryker Corporation (“Stryker”) and Howmedica Osteonics Corporation (“Howmedica”) d/b/a Stryker Orthopaedics (collectively, “defendants”) claiming damages resulting from the implantation of an allegedly defective artificial hip that was marketed, manufactured and distributed by ' defendants. Defendant Howmedica moves to dismiss plaintiffs complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure arguing that all but one of plaintiffs claims are…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Bausch v. Stryker Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Alton Bass v. Stryker CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Koenig v. Boulder Brands, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Marshall v. Hyundai Motor AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.