Legal Opinion
Minns's Case
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 26, 1934PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
This is a claim under the workmen’s compensation act. The employee worked for the insured, the Hood Rubber Company, from 1920 until November 28, 1928, when he left. It was agreed at the first hearing before a single member of the board on January 29, 1930, that the employee was totally disabled and had been disabled and under observation and the care of a physician since November, 1928. His total disablement continues. No question is raised on these points. The basis of his claim as *461now argued is that pulmonary tuberculosis, from which the employee is suffering, was “lit up” or aggravated by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Reilly v. Selectmen of BlackstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Green's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Sullivan's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Di Giovanni's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Pimental's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Wallace v. LudwigMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Di Clavio's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Meunier's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Crowley's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Indrisano's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.