Legal Opinion
Wallace v. Ludwig
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided October 30, 1935PublishedCited by 82 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
These are actions of tort. The first is brought to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff’s intestate, Phenelope Wallace, hereafter called the intestate, the second for her death, and the third for consequential damages caused to her husband. All arise out of the same incident and are founded on alleged negligence of the defendant in so operating his auto*252mobile as to strike the intestate while she was crossing a public way on foot. A general verdict was returned for the plaintiff in each case.
It is not necessary to recite the evidence. It warranted findings that…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Scheffer v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Sponatski's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
- Burns's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Armstrong v. Montgomery Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Freeman v. Mercantile Mutual Accident Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,686 Mary Hayes, Administrator of the Estate of Robert Hayes, Jr., and Eric Hayes v. Douglas Dynamics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Lipchitz v. Raytheon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Kent v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Alholm v. Town of WarehamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.