Legal Opinion
Di Clavio's Case
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 28, 1936PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
The questions presented are whether the claimants or either of them is entitled to compensation as a dependent of the deceased employee.
Facts which may be considered not in dispute are these: On March 20, 1933, the employee received an injury, when he was buried beneath a pile of coal at a wharf in Beverly where he was employed as foreman. He died the same day. His injury and death arose out of and in the course of his employment. In July, 1908, he married the claimant Innocenza Di Clavio in Italy. He lived with her there until the following March. It was then agreed between them for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Commonwealth v. PolianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Pearson v. MulloneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Brown's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Ford v. FordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Dillon's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Moore's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
- Chapman's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Evans's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Johnson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.