Legal Opinion
Indrisano's Case
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided December 10, 1940PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLummus, J.
The evidence warranted a finding of the following facts. The employee was a foreman in the employ of Thomas D. Russo Company, which was building the concrete foundation of a new building on its land on Florence Street in Roslindale. He had charge of the concrete work, and at the time in question no superior was present. On September 21, 1938, as he and the men under him finished *521their work shortly after six o’clock in the afternoon, and were about to lock up their tools in the shed and go home, the hurricane described in the opinion in Caswell’s Case, 305 Mass. 500, caused a branch, seven or…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Pigeon's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Caswell's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Gould's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Di Clavio's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Derinza's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Minot v. MinotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Haley's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970
- McLean's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Charron's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
- Caccamo's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.