Legal Opinion

Pimental's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 19, 1920PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal under the workmen’s compensation act from a decision of the Industrial Accident Board granting compensation of $14 a week to the employee for injuries, described in the opinion, found by the board to have arisen out of and in the course of his employment by Alies and Fisher Cigar Company. In the Superior Court the appeal was heard by Wait, J. Material evidence is described in the opinion.

Read the full summary

Appeal under the workmen’s compensation act from a decision of the Industrial Accident Board granting compensation of $14 a week to the employee for injuries, described in the opinion, found by the board to have arisen out of and in the course of his employment by Alies and Fisher Cigar Company. In the Superior Court the appeal was heard by Wait, J. Material evidence is described in the opinion. A decree was entered in accordance with the decision of the Industrial Accident Board; and the insurer appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

The employee is a cigar maker and worked continually at his trade for fourteen or fifteen years. Early in the year 1918 he began to have pain in the region of the back of his neck, and in February or March, 1919, he consulted a physician who told him that he had occupational neurosis. On May 2,1919, he was obliged to give up his work.

William J. Daly, the impartial physician, testified that the employee had “ an undeveloped left side; a shortened left leg with sinuses from old pus processes about the left buttock and the anterior surface of the hip; . . . faulty posture both in standing and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Hurle's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Johnson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Maggelet's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  5. H. P. Hood & Sons v. Maryland Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Gillette v. Harold, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Zerofski's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Fitzgibbons's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Hough v. Contributory Retirement Appeal BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Panagotopulos's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API