Legal Opinion

Sullivan's Case

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 3, 1929PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is a proceeding under the workmen’s compensation act. The question for decision is whether the employee received a personal injury arising out of and in the course of his employment, or whether he was merely suffering from disease so induced. His work was on granite or other stone with a surface cutting machine. Its method and effect of operation were described by him as follows: “This machine comes down with a point and hammers .... The power ... is furnished by compressed air. . . . That hammer comes up and down on the stone. The purpose of this machine in cutting stone is to refine it…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Madden's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Burns's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Hurle's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Johnson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  5. Maggelet's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Marsh v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. DeFilippo's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Plazak v. Allegheny Steel CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Zerofski's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Charon's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API