Lemansky v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
NARICK, Senior Judge.
Michael Lemansky (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the Workers’ Compensation Judge’s (WCJ) order granting a suspension of Claimant’s wage benefits and denying his request for attorney’s fees. The sole issue presented for our review is whether the WCJ and the Board erred as a matter of law in determining that Claimant was not entitled to reimbursement of reasonable attorney’s fees pursuant to § 440 of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act). 1 Because we find that Hagan Ice Cream Company (Employer) engaged in an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Berwick Industries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Penczkowski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Cunningham v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Transamerican Office Furniture v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Waldameer Park, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Gumm v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Brutico v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Armstrong v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Orenich v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.