Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 27, 2007PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge KELLEY.
Nathan Armstrong (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board), which affirmed the decision of a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) denying the Petition to Review a Utilization Determination filed by Dr. Peter Schatzberg (Provider). We affirm.
On February 7, 2005, Haines & Kibble-house, Inc. (Employer) issued a Notice of Temporary Compensation Payable (NTCP) indicating that on December 7, 2004, Claimant sustained compensable injuries to his left lower arm and left shoulder, described as “Left distal radius fracture;…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lehigh County Vo-Tech School v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Waldameer Park, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Lemansky v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Orenich v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Darrall v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Coyne v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Potere v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- S. Sloane v. WCAB (Children's Hospital of Philadelphia)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Zuchelli v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.