Schmitt v. Schmitt
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Brown county, Webber, J., denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, after a trial and verdict in favor of defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.
Ejectment to recover eighty acres of land in Brown county. Defendant had a verdict. Plaintiff paid the costs of the first trial, and upon demand obtained a second hearing under the statute, when defendant again succeeded. There was a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial upon the grounds that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict and for errors of law occurring at the trial. The blended motion was denied, and this appeal is from that order.
*415A careful examination of the entire record indicates that the only question which is it our duty to determine…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brown v. HoagSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Slingerland v. SlingerlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Slingerland v. SlingerlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bevington v. BevingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Wold v. WoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Werner v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Hayes v. HayesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Drager v. SeegertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.