Slingerland v. Slingerland
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Dodge county, Severance, J., presiding, (before whom, acting for the judge of the 5th district, the action was tried, without a jury,) refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
Dickinson, J.1
This is a second appeal in this action, which is prosecuted to compel the specific performance of an alleged agreement to convey real estate. The report of the case on the former appeal found in 39 Minn. 197, (39 N. W. Rep. 146,) discloses the nature of the alleged agreement, the relation of the parties, and the circumstances, so nearly in accordance with the case as it is now presented that we do not deem it necessary to make a general restatement of the facts as shown by the evidence, and as found by the *102court, at the second trial. The court found the fact of the agreement…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wilson v. NoonanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- Brown v. EatonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Slingerland v. SlingerlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Cantrell v. HewlettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1867
3Cited by5 opinions
- Philips v. MoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Ferguson v. TrovatenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Hayes v. HayesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Schmitt v. SchmittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Farmers Elevator Co. of Lansford v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915