Hayes v. Hayes
Supreme Court of Minnesota
After the decision of the former appeal, reported in 119 Minn. 1, 137 N. W. 162, defendant demanded a second trial. The case was tried before Hodgson, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of defendant. From an order denying plaintiffs’ motion for judgment in their favor notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, they appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.
This action in ejectment was commenced in the district court of Dakota county in July, 1909. It was tried to the court without a jury and a decision rendered in favor of plaintiffs. . An order denying a new trial'was affirmed by this court. Hayes v. Hayes, 119 Minn. 1, 137 N. W. 162. Defendant exercised the right she had under the statute then existing to a second trial. This trial was to a jury and resulted in a verdict for defendant. The case is now here on plaintiffs’ appeal from an order denying their motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial.
Pla…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Svanburg v. FosseenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Brown v. HoagSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Slingerland v. SlingerlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Brown v. KohoutSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Jorgenson v. JorgensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Papke v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Trebesch v. TrebeschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Wold v. WoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Drager v. SeegertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Ballard v. Sacramento Northern Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.