Legal Opinion
Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. Burton
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 24, 2004No. AC 23975PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FOTI, J.
The defendant, Michael L. Burton, appeals from the trial court’s judgment of strict foreclosure and from the denial of his motion to open and vacate that judgment. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly rendered the default judgment of strict foreclosure in violation of Practice Book § 17-32 (b). We conclude that the appeal is moot and must, therefore, be dismissed.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the resolution of the defendant’s claims. On July 24, 2002, the plaintiff, Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation, filed this action against…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. PareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Barclays Bank of New York v. IvlerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Doe v. Connecticut Bar Examining CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Savage v. SavageConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Original Grasso Construction Co. v. ShepherdConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. CharlesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. BertrandConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Murphy v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. TutsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- TOWN OF BRANFORD v. Van EckConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.