Legal Opinion
Barclays Bank of New York v. Ivler
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 24, 1989No. 7417PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
This is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of the named defendant’s1 motion to open a stipulated judgment of strict foreclosure. The defendant’s law day has passed and his equity of redemption has been extinguished. We conclude, sua sponte, that this case is moot and therefore must be dismissed.
For the purposes of this appeal, the following facts are relevant. On December 31,1985, the defendant executed and delivered to the plaintiff two promissory notes in the principal sums of $6,150,000 and $650,000. To secure these notes, the defendant simultaneously executed a first mortgage on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Conference Center Ltd. v. TRC—The Research Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- City Lumber Co. of Bridgeport, Inc. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- State v. Stonybrook, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- State v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- First Connecticut Capital, LLC v. Homes of Westport, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Ocwen Federal Bank, FSB v. CharlesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Madison Hills Ltd. Partnership II v. Madison Hills, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Fitzgerald (In Re Fitzgerald)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
- First National Bank of Chicago v. LueckenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.