Legal Opinion

Doe v. Connecticut Bar Examining Committee

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 1, 2003No. SC 16637PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BORDEN, J.

The defendant, the Connecticut bar examining committee, appeals and the plaintiff, John *41Doe, cross appeals1 from the judgment of the trial court reversing the defendant’s decision not to recommend him for admission to the bar of Connecticut and remanding the case for a new hearing before a new panel of the defendant. The defendant claims that the trial court: (1) utilized an improper standard of review when evaluating the defendant’s decision; and (2) improperly granted the plaintiffs motion to proceed anonymously in these proceedings. In his cross appeal, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. Kelly v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  4. Perricone v. PerriconeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  5. Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API