Legal Opinion

TOWN OF BRANFORD v. Van Eck

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 14, 2004No. AC 25019PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McLACHLAN, J.

In this action to foreclose a municipal tax lien, the defendant Jan Van Eck 1 appeals from the judgment of foreclosure by sale rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, the town of Branford. He claims on appeal that the court improperly granted the plaintiffs motion for judgment because (1) the plaintiff incorrectly certified service of its motion for judgment of foreclosure by sale (2) the plaintiff failed to make adequate abode service of process on the defendant’s wife, Linda A. Van Eck, and (3) the first mortgagee had not been made a party to the action.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. BurtonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  2. Bria v. Ventana Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. GMAC Mortgage Corp. v. GlennConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  2. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. FritzellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  3. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. FritzellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. Town of Branford v. Van EckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API