People v. Schenone
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, and from an order denying a new trial. C. W. Norton, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The defendant, having been convicted of grand larceny, appeals from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The principal contentions of appellant are that the court erred in the matter of instructions and that the defendant was entitled to an acquittal, for the reason that the offense, if any, was that of obtaining money by false pretenses instead of grand larceny.
Appellant concedes that “It would be very difficult for us to point out the specific particulars wherein the instructions prejudice the substantial rights of the defendant.” As might be expected from this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. DelbosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- People v. ArnoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- State v. StratfordIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
- In Re ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- People v. BalloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- People v. DeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.