Legal Opinion

People v. Ballo

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 1, 1912No. Crim. No. 181PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny, and from the judgment of conviction and the order denying him a new trial he prosecutes this appeal.

The assault upon the judgment and order is founded principally upon alleged errors of the trial court in the statement of the law to the jury.

The facts are briefly these: The complaining witness, one G. Saloni, an Italian laborer, went to the city of Stockton with an acquaintance of his in the month of December, 1911. They registered at the Roma Hotel, which was conducted by one of their countrymen. Saloni had for some time prior to his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. SchenoneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  2. People v. DeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API